Render error: SyntaxError: JSON.parse: unexpected character at line 1 column 1 of the JSON data
The dashboard is just a white space while the other tabs and screens seem to work. Anyone know a quick fix for this perhaps so i can test the lines?
Hi,
I wondered also what would be the best Edgerouter for a Lan party for approx 100 gamers with some e-sport competition.
The plan is to use it as a internet router only, all inter-Vlan (will maybe use some vlans) routing will be handled by a Cisco L3 switch.
I effectively wanted to use the "new" ER4 or ER6 but was worried about NAT which seems to be not offloaded
I saw in some posts that on the ER4 the hwnat offload is not supported. So wondering if an ER4 will be able to handle 100 gamer and more using all an unique (or maybe 2-3) external Public IP, There will be quite a lot of Nat masquerade to handle by this small router no ?
or maybe i'm wrong with the NAT being not offloaded on ER4 ?
Nico
wrote: I am assuming that getting the device recognised, firmware injected etc. by the Edgerouter would be enough to have it act like a standard SFP and the g.fast side of things is handled transparently. Does that sound reasonable?
I think so. There are three components by the looks of it. Doing a firmware upload when the SFP is powered up. The fabled Ethernet Boot Management protocol to read the device status and possibly set things via an SNMP MIB by the looks of things, and a dying gasp driver. I suspect only the first is required to actually get it working.
I had a brush up on my MIPS assembler last night to ptobably tackle the handle_downloadfw_metabin_withpacktool routine first.
So, this problem has now gone.
I can now ping any external host or IP address, resolving is quick and pages load normally.
In fact, quicker than they have ever been!
I purchased a new ER-X but have not changed it, so I can only assume that my Technical Support Ticket and Tweets to ISP Plusnet in the UK have been answered...
...although they maintain "nothing changed."
Yeah, right.
Sorry to have bothered you all here.
Regards,
Paully
Set the Nat on et0.101, the actual wan interface.
Cheers,
jonatha
Ben
Hi,
it's now been approximately 3 years and from what I can tell, this feature is still not there. Any updates on when it might happen?
I ran into the same but found out what the problem was so I am posting it here. The newCA script asks for a
The third one is asking you for what you entered on the first one.
I could have guessed immediately as the first one is preceded by
writing new private key to './demoCA/private/./cakey.pem'
Which means that the third one is about the same object as the first one.
wrote: destination group address-group ADDRv4_ethX
My bad, you are absolutely right! It might help to turn on the brain before posting Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Thanks, I've disabled it --- give it some time and I'll see how it works.
What's the default for the timeout? I've set it to 900. 28800 seems rather long.
It's now been another half year or so, any progress on this?
I give up
Since i cant upgrade to the 5.9 branch because of bugs (described elsewhere) to use the gui for IPS, how does one add addtional rules to the USG config manually, i have the current config as above on the USG, how do i add more?
Hi Guys,
I installed the EdgeRouter PoE load balanced over 2 WAN's. It works perfectly, but now I'm trying to forward ports to my machines behind the router and I've read a lot of posts but am still not able to get it working. I just want to forward port 8888 to address 10.0.0.6 port 80. I've succesfully changed the GUI port and can access the GUI remotely, I would think that it's the same logic as this but no dice.
Can anyone please help?
I have a fixed IP from my ISP and no ports are blocked.
Thanks a lot!
Below is my current configuration:
firewall { all-ping enable broadcast-ping disable group { network-group PRIVATE_NETS { network 192.168.0.0/16 network 172.16.0.0/12 network 10.0.0.0/8 } } ipv6-receive-redirects disable ipv6-src-route disable ip-src-route disable log-martians disable modify balance { rule 10 { action modify description "do NOT load balance lan to lan" destination { group { network-group PRIVATE_NETS } } modify { table main } } rule 20 { action modify description "do NOT load balance destination public address" destination { group { address-group ADDRv4_eth0 } } modify { table main } } rule 30 { action modify description "do NOT load balance destination public address" destination { group { address-group ADDRv4_eth1 } } modify { table main } } rule 70 { action modify modify { lb-group G } } } name WAN_IN { default-action drop description "WAN to internal" rule 10 { action accept description "Allow established/related" state { established enable related enable } } rule 30 { action drop description "Drop invalid state" state { invalid enable } } } name WAN_LOCAL { default-action drop description "WAN to router" rule 10 { action accept description test destination { port 8888 } log enable protocol tcp_udp state { established enable invalid enable new enable related enable } } rule 20 { action accept description "Allow established/related" state { established enable related enable } } rule 30 { action drop description "Drop invalid state" state { invalid enable } } rule 40 { action accept description "Remote access" destination { port 8081,443,22 } log enable protocol tcp } } receive-redirects disable send-redirects enable source-validation disable syn-cookies enable } interfaces { ethernet eth0 { address dhcp description WAN duplex auto firewall { in { name WAN_IN } local { name WAN_LOCAL } } poe { output off } speed auto } ethernet eth1 { address dhcp description "WAN 2" duplex auto firewall { in { name WAN_IN } local { name WAN_LOCAL } } poe { output off } speed auto } ethernet eth2 { duplex auto poe { output off } speed auto } ethernet eth3 { duplex auto poe { output off } speed auto } ethernet eth4 { duplex auto poe { output off } speed auto } loopback lo { } switch switch0 { address 10.0.0.1/24 description Local firewall { in { modify balance } } switch-port { interface eth2 { } interface eth3 { } interface eth4 { } } } } load-balance { group G { interface eth0 { } interface eth1 { } } } port-forward { auto-firewall enable hairpin-nat enable lan-interface switch0 rule 1 { description test forward-to { address 10.0.0.6 port 80 } original-port 8888 protocol tcp_udp } wan-interface eth0 } service { dhcp-server { disabled false hostfile-update disable shared-network-name LAN { authoritative enable subnet 10.0.0.0/24 { default-router 10.0.0.1 dns-server 10.0.0.1 lease 86400 start 10.0.0.50 { stop 10.0.0.243 } } } } dns { forwarding { cache-size 150 listen-on switch0 } } gui { https-port 8081 } nat { rule 5000 { description "masquerade for WAN" outbound-interface eth0 type masquerade } rule 5002 { description "masquerade for WAN 2" outbound-interface eth1 type masquerade } } ssh { port 22 protocol-version v2 } unms { disable } } system { conntrack { expect-table-size 4096 hash-size 4096 table-size 32768 tcp { half-open-connections 512 loose enable max-retrans 3 } } host-name ubnt login { user tom { authentication { encrypted-password **************** } level admin } } ntp { server 0.ubnt.pool.ntp.org { } server 1.ubnt.pool.ntp.org { } server 2.ubnt.pool.ntp.org { } server 3.ubnt.pool.ntp.org { } } syslog { global { facility all { level notice } facility protocols { level debug } } } time-zone UTC }
That would be seriously impressive and greatly appreciated.
Being able to go back to using my Edgerouter would be great.
Please let me know what's needed from my side in terms of testing etc.
More than happy to do what's needed.
Hi,
I'm confused if I have a NAT or Firewall problem.
I have two Edgerouters, ER1 & ER2 linked by Nanobeams over a mile or two.
ER1 has eth0 WAN connection to outside world.
ER2 eth0 masquerades WAN from ER1 which all works fine, all devices/APs on ER2 have internet access fine, and can ping devices in ER1 LANs.
My problem is I cant ping any devices in ER2 from anywhere within ER1.
The reason for having 2 routers is that ER2 is routing a whole bunch of industrial PLCs/SCADA etc so if the Nanobeam link is dropped I still want ER2 to do the routing for its own LANs.
Do I need to turn off NAT on ER2? Is it as simple as deleting the rule from the NAT page in the GUI?
Or what settings in ER2 firewall need to be adjusted to allow ER1 access to ER2?
Thanks in advance.
Just don't expect anything quick. Probably take me several weeks to reproduce the firmware download routine depending on other things. Most usefull thing is plug away at getting the source for the kernel driver at this point in time.
If I set up a DHCP static IP per the User Guide's instructions, how is the client configured? Does the client just see a normal DHCP server (that happens to give it the same IP address every time it renews its lease)?
I haven't bought an EdgeRouter yet. Trying to compare to my current router, where the router can only "reserve" an address within the DHCP range for a client, but I have to manually configure the client's static IP, subnet and DNS. Thanks.